You are an expert in classifying Climate Change related tweets into its stance categories: 'neutral', 'support', and 'denial', i.e. determine the authors stance toward Climate Change.
Here are some rules and examples to guide you:
**Rule 1: Keyword Presence**
* **Support**: Presence of keywords like "urgent", "action", "mitigate", "reduce", "carbon neutral", or phrases indicating climate change severity.
+ Example tweet: "We need urgent action to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change. #ActOnClimate"
+ Classification: Support
* **Denial**: Presence of keywords like "hoax", "myth", "debate", or phrases downplaying climate change severity.
+ Example tweet: "The whole climate change thing is a myth, let's focus on real issues #NotMyProblem"
+ Classification: Denial
* **Neutral**: Absence of stance-indicative keywords.
**Rule 2: Tone and Emotions**
* **Support**: Tweets expressing concern, fear, or urgency about the consequences of climate change.
+ Example tweet: "I'm getting anxious thinking about the future of our planet if we don't address climate change now. What can we do?"
+ Classification: Support
* **Denial**: Tweets using dismissive language, sarcasm, or mocking tone towards climate change concerns.
+ Example tweet: "Oh great, another apocalypse coming for us. Can I just enjoy my burger in peace? #ClimateChangeIsABunchOfHooey"
+ Classification: Denial
* **Neutral**: Tweets without emotional language.
**Rule 3: Fact-based Statements**
* **Support**: Tweets citing scientific evidence, statistics, or data supporting climate change.
+ Example tweet: "Did you know that 97% of climate scientists agree on human-caused global warming? #ClimateScience"
+ Classification: Support
* **Denial**: Tweets using misinformation, pseudoscience, or cherry-picked data to undermine climate change facts.
+ Example tweet: "The Arctic ice cap has actually been growing over the past 10 years! The media is just trying to scare us. #ClimateDebunked"
+ Classification: Denial
* **Neutral**: Tweets not referencing specific scientific evidence.
**Rule 4: Contextual Understanding**
* **Support**: Tweets discussing individual actions, policy initiatives, or technological solutions aimed at mitigating climate change.
+ Example tweet: "Just installed solar panels on my roof to reduce my carbon footprint. Who's with me? #Sustainability"
+ Classification: Support
* **Denial**: Tweets dismissing the need for individual or collective action to address climate change.
+ Example tweet: "We can't do anything about it, so why bother trying? Just relax and enjoy your gas-guzzling SUV."
+ Classification: Denial
* **Neutral**: Tweets not advocating for action.
**Rule 5: Linguistic Patterns**
* **Support**: Tweets using phrases like "we need to" or "it's time to", indicating a sense of urgency and collective responsibility.
+ Example tweet: "We need to take immediate action on climate change to protect our planet. #ActNow"
+ Classification: Support
* **Denial**: Tweets employing rhetorical questions, sarcastic tone, or mocking language to downplay climate change concerns.
+ Example tweet: "What's the point of worrying about climate change? It's not like we can do anything about it anyway... right?"
+ Classification: Denial
* **Neutral**: Tweets without stance-indicative linguistic patterns.
Note: The tweet should be classified based on what the entire tweet text says.